One reader's rave

"Thanks for the newspaper with your book review. I can’t tell you how impressed I am with this terrific piece of writing. It is beautiful, complex, scholarly. Only sorry Mr. Freire cannot read it!" -- Ailene

Cassie Jaye, the day before I met her at the _Red Pill_ world premiere

Monday, February 10, 2025

Tomorrow at Penn: You Can't Say That: American Higher Education and the War on Free Speech

Philo at Penn announces:

 


 

Our next Afternoon Professor Tea of the semester will be hosted next Tuesday on February 11th at 3:30 PM in the Philo Halls. Philo will host Dr. Jonathan Zimmerman for a tea and discussion titled "You Can't Say That: American Higher Education and the War on Free Speech." This is part of our 2025 Kojo Minta Memorial Tea Series. 

The Halls are located on the 4th Floor of College Hall. Enter through the East side of the building (closest to Fisher Fine Arts Library) and walk up the stairs to the 3rd Floor. There, a member of Philo will be present to direct you to the Halls. 

Registration is required for this event. Please register as soon as possible using the link below or scan the QR code on the flyer. We are excited to see you there.


Register for Dr. Zimmerman Tea Here

 

Thursday, February 06, 2025

Platypus Philadelphia reading group meeting: Lenin and the Vanguard Party


The group is meeting at the same time, day, and place as last week. I didn't have to show Penn ID to be buzzed in.


Platypus Philadelphia
Introduction to Revolutionary Marxism Reading Group

February 8, 2025
1 PM

Houston Hall
Houston Market (basement level with restaurants! Keep an eye out for the Lenin cardboard cutout)
Philadelphia, PA


Week 13. Lenin and the vanguard party | Feb. 8, 2025

• Spartacist LeagueLenin and the Vanguard Party (1978)
+ Richard Appignanesi and Oscar Zarate / A&Z, Introducing Lenin and the Russian Revolution / Lenin for Beginners (1977)

Wednesday, January 22, 2025

Biden: I Hit Him Cuz He Was Gonna Hit Me First

 


 

The latest liberal hypocrisy is discussed by Glenn Greenwald in this video. Once again Democrats do exactly what they denounced Trump for (allegedly) wanting to do. The quote above concerning Presidential pardons is from a Supreme Court decision a century ago.

https://fstube.net/w/1rKLf5zHxTTWCB2NKqxqNX

Open Primaries Discussion with Chloe Akers

 

 

From Open Primaries:


On Thursday January 30th at 2pm, we’re hosting our first Primary Buzz Discussion of 2025 and it’s one you don’t want to miss. Open Primaries Founder & President John Opdycke is swapping roles and will be interviewed by our guest moderator Chloe Akers–the Founder and CEO of The Best of Tennessee–an organization focused on educating voters about the importance of participating in primary elections and bringing more “complexity” to political conversation.

Opdycke and Akers will have an honest, open and forward-looking discussion on where we are as a movement and how we build a powerful going-forward strategy.

SIGN UP

Sign up, bring your questions and join the conversation to get us off on the right foot in 2025.  It’s also recommended that you read John’s year end report in advance.

See you there,

The Open Primaries Team

Wednesday, January 15, 2025

President Biden and Attorney General Merrick B. Garland: Exonerate our mother, Ethel Rosenberg

 Please join me in signing this before President Biden leaves office.


 Ethel Rosenberg in her NYC residence. She wears a sleeveless, floral dress.

Written by Rosenberg sons, Robert and Michael Meeropol

Our parents, Ethel and Julius Rosenberg, were executed on June 19, 1953 during the anti-communist hysteria of the Cold War Era. They had been convicted of conspiracy to commit espionage, in what was called “the crime of the century.” We were six and 10 years old when they were killed.

We have said for years that our mother was not a spy, and her execution was wrongful.

A newly declassified NSA memorandum dated August 22, 1950 – ten days after our mother’s arrest – confirms that the U.S. government knew Ethel Rosenberg was not a spy long before her trial and execution. Authored by then-chief analyst of the NSA Meredith Gardner, the memo reveals that he concluded from reviewing Soviet Intelligence that Ethel Rosenberg was not a spy.

This final release serves as the capstone for an overwhelming body of evidence that the U.S. government knew Ethel Rosenberg never spied for the Soviet Union.

Her conviction was based on perjured testimony and prosecutorial and judicial misconduct. The only evidence against Ethel at trial was given by proven liars, David and Ruth Greenglass. US Government files state there was insufficient evidence to indict Ethel but that she could be used as a "lever" against her husband. The KGB gave all its agents in the US code names, but Ethel had none. After her arrest the National Security Agency’s chief analyst, Meredith Gardner, wrote, that Ethel, “knew about her husbands work, but that due to ill health she did not engage in the work herself.” In 2001, David Greenglass admitted on national television that he lied about Ethel’s involvement to protect his wife. Never have the elements of a government frame-up been so clearly revealed.

The trial took place during a time of widespread panic about communism. The sentencing judge went so far as to blame our parents for the Korean War. In denying clemency, President Eisenhower accused them of causing future nuclear wars. These outrageous statements and our parents’ executions helped fuel a dangerous climate of fear and intolerance which permitted political opportunists like Senator Joseph McCarthy to poison our society.

A formal acknowledgement of the wrong done to our mother and our family will help prevent similar injustices in the future. A healthy democracy requires that the government acknowledge and correct its transgressions. The government cannot return our mother to her loving family. But it can admit this miscarriage of justice.

Please, join us in calling on President Biden and Attorney General Garland to formally exonerate Ethel Rosenberg now. More than 70 years after her unjust conviction and execution, now is the time to right this historic injustice, redress the harm done to the Rosenberg/Meeropol family and finally clear her good name.

Monday, January 13, 2025

Braver Angels to Screen The Red Pill




A couple hundred people attended the world premiere of this film in 2016, but I was just one of a handful at the first afternoon screening and got to meet several of those involved with the film, including director Cassie Jaye, co-producer Nena Jaye, A Voice for Men's Paul Elam, and Honey Badgers Alison Tieman and Karen Straughan. It will be interesting to see it again and discuss it with other Braver Angels.


Date: Jan 29 • 8:00 pm


https://www.eventbrite.com/e/film-discussion-national-film-club-discussion-of-the-red-pill-ba-nati-registration-1143411818529?aff=ebdsshother&utm_share_source=listing_android




Saturday, January 11, 2025

A Common Principle to Unite Political Reforms


A recent article in The Fulcrum says it was a mistake for recent referendum campaigns to combine proposals for open primaries and ranked-choice voting because voters were confused about why they were being proposed together, and argued that future campaigns should simply drop RCV from the package. I think that's the wrong answer. Here's what I wrote them:


There may be no logical connection between open partisan primaries and ranked choice voting, but there very much is for nonpartisan primaries. That connection is the principle of majority rule.

Nonpartisan primaries are superior for a couple reasons. One is that they avoid the perception that members of one party are intruding on the internal decisions of another, since everyone of every persuasion is equally free to vote their preference from a single field of candidates. Another is that it removes the obligation on voters to choose one major party over another even temporarily, and the burden of having to formally affiliate with a political body in a way that may feel insincere and rather like lying about their beliefs.

But if nonpartisan primaries are adopted, there's no guarantee that one candidate will receive a majority of the votes; all other things being equal, this is even less likely than in a partisan primary. If the principle of majority rule is to be upheld -- if there's to be assurance that the ultimate winner reflects in some sense a majority preference -- a straight runoff may not suffice, since the "top two" may have received less than half the total primary votes.

An example is the French presidential elections of 2002. The votes in the first round were divided up among a great number of parties, but more so on the left than on the right. As a result, even though the majority of voters had chosen left-of-center candidates, the top two were both on the right -- Jacques Chirac for the traditional right and Jean-Marie Le Pen for the far right. So in the runoff, many voters felt they had no choice but to "hold their noses" and vote for Chirac in order to defeat Le Pen.

But this scenario would be avoided with RCV. All that's required is the proviso that the candidates included in the second round are just those top vote-getters required to account for a majority of first-round votes. Especially with the aid of examples like the one above, it would be quite simple to explain this principle to people in a referendum campaign. Not only would they not be mystified about why the two issues were being combined, they would welcome this measure to prevent the election of candidates who don't represent the true preference of a majority of voters.

 

 

Sunday, December 22, 2024

Philly March to Save Immigrant Lives









On Wednesday, 18 December, people rallied and marched to fight President-elect Trump's mass deportation plans. I made my own sign for the occasion. Follow the link below for a video of one of the speeches at the opening rally plus a pan of the crowd.


https://fstube.net/w/31rwnnfwSdbeb3HjSgRsDU