One reader's rave

"Thanks for the newspaper with your book review. I can’t tell you how impressed I am with this terrific piece of writing. It is beautiful, complex, scholarly. Only sorry Mr. Freire cannot read it!" -- Ailene

Cassie Jaye, the day before I met her at the _Red Pill_ world premiere

Saturday, April 27, 2024

FIRE Answers Questions About Students’ Expressive Rights



A message from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression:

Here’s what students need to know about protesting on campus right now
As Israel/Gaza campus protests spread nationwide, FIRE answers questions about students’ expressive rights.
by FIRE
April 25, 2024


Student protest is a proud democratic tradition on our college campuses.

For generations, college students have engaged in protest to express their views, to actively participate in the public conversation and, in doing so, to draw wider attention to causes they care about. As tensions on U.S. campuses have ramped up in recent weeks, sparked by the October 7 Hamas attacks on Israel and subsequent war in Gaza, it’s no surprise that student protests have also proliferated.

We’ve seen many students engage in First Amendment-protected peaceful protests. We’ve also seen severe campus disruptions and even isolated acts of violence — particularly over the past few days. Now, hundreds of students across the country have taken to their campuses to protest institutional engagement with Israel or to show solidarity with students at Columbia University, who were arrested last Thursday for protesting in the form of a round-the-clock encampment.

In the latest news, state troopers acting under Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s direction arrested at least 50 demonstrators at the University of Texas at Austin. This comes after a March 27 executive order from Gov. Abbott, in which he singled out the Palestine Solidarity Committee, the same group that organized yesterday’s protest, for discipline in the event that the group violated campus speech policies designed to “address the sharp rise in antisemitic speech.”

If you are a student or faculty member on campus and believe your rights have been violated, submit a case here and we will get back to you within 24 hours.

The ability to distinguish between peaceful protest, civil disobedience, and genuine misconduct is as important now as ever.

To be clear: FIRE takes no stance on the content of the speech we defend. Time and again, both recently and throughout our 25 years defending student rights, we’ve defended the rights of pro-Palestinian and pro-Israeli speakers alike. Yet we’ve always drawn a distinction between protected speech and unprotected conduct: The former reflects the core purpose of a functioning university; the latter undermines it.

Students should know their rights. We hope this Q&A will equip students to speak freely.


I go to a public college. Can I protest on campus?

Yes. Public universities are government entities bound by the Constitution and students on public campuses have free speech rights protected by the First Amendment. Depending on where, when, and how you protest, public universities can set some reasonable, narrowly-tailored limits on your protest, but they cannot limit the views you express. (More on “time, place, and manner” regulations below.)

I go to a private college. Can I protest on campus?

Probably. Even though private institutions are not required to honor constitutional rights (which only apply to government actors, like public universities), the vast majority of private colleges promise their students the right to free speech. Schools with a religious or military-related mission sometimes prioritize other values over free expression, meaning your rights at those schools may be more limited. Be sure to check your student handbook or FIRE’s Spotlight Database to learn about your rights and your school’s campus demonstration rules. If your college promises you the right to protest, you should insist the administration keep that promise.

If you are a student journalist seeking legal resources, call FIRE’s 24-hour Student Press Freedom Initiative hotline at 717-734-SPFI (7734) for help.

Are all forms of protest protected?

The First Amendment protects your right to speak your mind with only limited exceptions. But public colleges (and private ones with strong free speech protections) are allowed to maintain reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on student speech in public areas of campus. These regulations must be viewpoint- and content-neutral rules on where, when, and how you can demonstrate on campus, in order to prevent disrupting the educational environment. Even in open, outdoor areas where campus protests are common, colleges might restrict some or all use of amplified sound, setting up tables or other structures, camping, and overnight protests. To be constitutional, those rules must apply to everyone, no matter their viewpoint and even when they’re not trying to convey a message at all.

For example, a college can prohibit loud amplification near school buildings during hours that classes are in session. But the rule has to be applied even-handedly. The school can’t allow the College Republicans to use a megaphone but forbid the College Democrats from doing so—or vice versa. Keep in mind that these rules also have to be reasonable. It’s unlikely reasonable to, say, limit all demonstrations to a tiny corner of campus on weekdays between 4:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. to keep campus running smoothly.

What forms of protest are not protected?

The First Amendment does not protect unlawful conduct. If you engage in conduct while protesting that violates the law — such as violence, assault, vandalism, or underage drinking — you can face arrest and/or campus disciplinary proceedings. Other unprotected conduct (including speech) that can lead to arrest or disciplinary action includes: True threats and intimidation
Incitement
Discriminatory harassment
Substantially disrupting events or deplatforming speakers

For a more detailed explanation of the First Amendment’s boundaries, check out this article by FIRE Legal Director Will Creeley.

Is civil disobedience free speech?

Civil disobedience is nonviolent unlawful conduct undertaken intentionally as a form of protest. Examples might include occupying a campus building or participating in a “die-in” that blocks traffic on a campus street. Acts of civil disobedience may strike onlookers as powerful because they reflect belief strong enough to violate existing law or policy. But students who engage in civil disobedience should realize that breaking the law — or campus policy — may result in consequences. And that price may include facing legal or institutional punishment by their college or university.
 
What about encampments? Can I join one on my campus?

If you are a faculty member at a public college or university, call FIRE’s Faculty Legal Defense Fund hotline at 254-500-FLDF (3533) if you fear your academic freedom or right to free speech is in jeopardy.

In recent days, a large encampment in the heart of the Columbia campus has spawned similar demonstrations at other colleges and universities. Columbia’s encampment received national media attention first for its size, and subsequently due to the university’s decision last week to suspend and arrest protesters who refused to leave it.

Even in open, outdoor areas of campus where protest is typically allowed, universities can still regulate large gatherings and overnight camping. Such regulations on protest or use of grounds typically appear in student handbooks or other policy documents.

In short, colleges can regulate around-the-clock encampments, even removing or arresting protesters who refuse to leave them. Students occupying campus spaces in violation of reasonable, content-neutral rules risk punishment. When that punishment is viewpoint-neutral, proportional, and in keeping with past practice, it does not violate expressive rights.

Do I give up all my free speech rights if I participate in civil disobedience?

No. Even though the police or college officials can remove or punish you for disruptive activity like blocking traffic or interrupting classes, they can’t do so because they don’t like your message or point of view. Keep an eye out for uneven enforcement of ostensibly neutral rules in ways that target only controversial speech.

For example, your college shouldn’t punish you or your student group more harshly than other groups in similar circumstances because administrators found your message upsetting, offensive, divisive, or because it drew ire, demanded extra security, or prompted counter-protest. And even in cases where punishment is warranted, students remain entitled to meaningful due process rights.

How can the police respond to my protest?

The police must use proportional and reasonable force to disperse protests that cross into unprotected conduct, such as those that turn violent; violate the law; violate reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions; or are substantially disruptive.
 
Is my right to protest the same indoors as outdoors?

No. While outdoor areas of campus have been viewed as traditional public forums where speech is entitled to significant protection and fewer limitations, courts have not viewed indoor spaces the same way. Some institutions, through policy or practice, create limited public forums in certain indoor areas, but colleges typically have significantly more authority to regulate indoor spaces.

Because of concerns about disruption, noise, and even fire safety, colleges may generally impose more restrictive rules on what students can do inside buildings. By contrast, colleges have very little justification for suppressing a peaceful student protest on the quad or in other open, public areas of campus — and the law often backs up students in those circumstances.

Should I document what happens at our protest?

Yes! The authorities tend to be better behaved (in a legal sense) when video cameras are rolling. And if you are detained or arrested, a video can be the evidence you need to get out of the situation as fast as possible. Do all recording openly. Some states restrict recording that happens without someone’s knowledge.

Should I insist on my rights while I’m protesting? Even if I’m told to leave?

Absolutely. Know your rights, insist they are respected, and be aware that you may be better educated on those rights than campus administrators or police.

For example, a number of public colleges across the country have policies limiting all demonstrations to small or out-of-the-way “free speech zones,” even though these zones rarely hold up in court. Politely but adamantly insisting that you have the right to be somewhere may be effective, especially if you or a member of your group is recording the interaction.

What if I’m told I can’t demonstrate without a permit?

You should be allowed to engage in expressive activities — like holding up a sign, leafleting, or petitioning for signatures — by yourself or in groups without a permit in outside areas of campus open to all students. If you are not disrupting classes or blocking people or traffic, your activity should be protected by the First Amendment or private colleges’ similar policies.

Colleges sometimes have overly restrictive policies forbidding all expression without a permit, or policies against “solicitation” that they use to prevent all leafleting and petitioning. If you come across such policies, they may be unlawful, and you should let FIRE know.

Can my school ban all protests?

Absolutely not. While public colleges (and private ones with strong free speech protections) may impose reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on protests to ensure there is no disruption to the functioning of the college, these policies may not unreasonably restrict the right to peacefully protest.

Saturday, April 20, 2024

Petition: Stop a Regional War

 

From Standing Together:


More than 300 missiles and drones launched into Israeli territory were not enough for our crazy government -- now, they are talking about Israel's response (to the Iranian regime’s response) that will ignite a regional war -- a war that will put us in shelters for months, will result in mass deaths in Israel and will drag the entire region into destruction.

After six months of daily death, when the hostages are still in Gaza and hundreds of thousands of people have been evacuated from their homes, we demand that we not be dragged into a regional war.

Instead -- we need to reach a deal that will bring back the hostages, stop the war in Gaza, and cease all the fronts of war -- with Hezbollah, the Iranian Regime, and in Gaza and the West Bank.

Add your signature to the petition and spread it far and wide!

SIGN THE PETITION
SIGN THE PETITION

Sunday, April 07, 2024

Remembering Harry Hay on His Birthday

 




 
 
Born on this day in 1912: gay rights pioneer Harry Hay. From Wikipedia:
 
"Henry "Harry" Hay Jr. (April 7, 1912 – October 24, 2002) was an American gay rights activist, communist, and labor advocate. He was a co-founder of the Mattachine Society, the first sustained gay rights group in the United States, as well as the Radical Faeries, a loosely affiliated gay spiritual movement."
 
Homophobes like to circulate a picture of Hay at a 1986 pride parade, protesting the exclusion of the North American Man/Boy Love Association. They're trying to exploit the stereotype of gays as sexual "predators" on youth, but conveniently ignore the fact that Hay's perspective, like that of so many others, came from the other side of that relationship. As related in Positive Memories by T. Rivas:
 
"Harry Hay (1912-2002) was a leading American within gay liberation. When he was 14 years old, he met a merchant-seaman of about age 25. Rind writes:
 
"'One evening, when the two walked alongside the moonlit ocean, Hay was swept by the physical sensations. When Hay clasped the man's hand, the boy was afraid the sailor might respond violently. Instead, it turned into Hay's first lovemaking with an adult. When Hay revealed that he was only 14, the sailor panicked for fear of a lengthy prison sentence. Hay desperately tried to settle the man down, and when he did, the man gave the boy tips on how people like us should conduct themselves, which inspired Harry almost as vividly as the erotic memory of [the man].'
 
"Bruce Rind tells us that according to Hay's biographer Timmons, Hay always described it as the most beautiful gift that a fourteen-year-old ever got from his first love!
 
"According to another author quoted by Rind, Hay remarked, 'Wherever he is, I want him to know that my love and gratitude followed him all my days, and all of his.'"
 
(Source: Article by Bruce Rind “Blinded by Politics and
Morality – A Reply to McAnulty and Wright” in Censoring

Wednesday, April 03, 2024

FIRE: College Students Deserve Due Process Protections

From the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression:



This spring, the government is expected to make investigations of campus sexual misconduct less fair and less accurate.


The Department of Education will release new rules on how colleges investigate allegations of sexual misconduct. The rules are likely to deprive students of important rights during the fact-finding process — such as a live hearing, the cross-examination of witnesses, and the ability to have an attorney present.

These are rights that any of us would want in a process designed to determine guilt or innocence. And they’re especially important during high-stakes investigations on serious misconduct like sexual harassment. 

The stakes are high — too high to get wrong. Colleges must punish students guilty of sexual misconduct, and they must not punish students who are innocent. That’s why colleges need to use every tool in the toolbox to get it right and increase the likelihood of uncovering the truth.

And the American people agree. In our survey with IPSOS:

  • 63% agreed that interviews conducted through written testimony are less insightful than in-person interviews.
  • 68% say schools must conduct a hearing where both the accused and accuser may hear and contest evidence.
  • 79% agreed that all students involved in these investigations should have the right to hire a lawyer.

Despite the popularity of these rights for a fair investigation, they’re all on the chopping block.

"Our polling shows that the public overwhelmingly rejects the false choice between protecting victims and upholding due process for the accused," said FIRE Lead Counsel for Government Affairs Tyler Coward. "Americans believe that campus sexual assault is a serious problem, but that scrapping basic standards of fairness and impartiality isn’t the answer."

Monday, April 01, 2024

Happy Birthday, Chip Delany!


 

Today is Samuel Delany's 82nd birthday. As related by Wikipedia, "Samuel R. 'Chip' Delany is an American writer and literary critic. His work includes fiction (especially science fiction), memoir, criticism, and essays on science fiction, literature, sexuality, and society."

This is one of a number of science fiction writers I haven't given as much attention to as I intend; I think the only novel of his I've read so far is Babel-17, which explores the relationship between language and thought. I did get to meet him once rather serendipitously several years ago, while I was running a Meetup group on Psychology and Social Change which was meeting at Robin's Bookstore. He happened to be in the store and saw us there, and we spent some time conversing. I also heard him at Temple University a number of years ago when he introduced a talk by Neil Gaiman, another great writer.

Wikipedia further notes:

"Delany's sustained thematic engagement with difference, normativity, and their potential subversions or reifications ... [place] him as an important interlocutor in the fields of Queer theory and Black studies.

[...]

He has commented that he believes that to omit the sexual practices that he portrays in his writing would limit the dialogue children and adults can have about it themselves, and that this lack of knowledge can be fatal."

This understanding is partially rooted in an experience he and a friend had at the age of six -- which he has described as having been "a big help" later when he was coming to terms with his homosexuality, "when I was seventeen or so" -- which is described in the interview at the url pictured below.